Guided demo
Experience the reasoning journey.
Work through a fictional Marketing case, respond to a source-grounded challenge and see how the complete journey reaches lecturer review. No account or upload needed.
Guided student demo
Experience one adaptive reasoning journey.
Four short steps, from source evidence to lecturer review. A scripted Marketing example, not a live assessment. No sign in or upload needed.
Ground in evidence
Sefako Rivers Beverages is a mid sized producer of chilled juices. The board has asked for a recommendation on entering three neighbouring regional markets within eighteen months. Extracts from the case appear below.
Mark two or three blocks as decisive to your recommendation.
0 of 3 selected.
Select at least two evidence blocks to continue.
Optional: explore assessment setup, review and insights
Assessment builder
Akanya does not add hours to an assessment.
It helps lecturers decide how the existing assessment time should be used.
Change the settings below and watch the proposed structure update. This is a bounded preview built for the public site, using predefined configuration outcomes.
Configure
Proposed structure
Updates live- Estimated reasoning time
- 18 minutes
- Traditional response time
- 162 minutes
- Judgement touchpoints
- 2
- Components in journey
- 7
Your three hours assessment remains within the original assessment window. The time is redistributed, not extended.
Recommended reasoning components
- Source evidence
- Evidence selection
- Analysis
- Initial position
- Targeted challenge
- Revision
- Final judgement
Suggested use case: A examination that ends in a recommendation the student must defend.
Rationale: An examination carries weight, so the reasoning journey is worth protecting inside the existing window. Judgement outcomes need a defended conclusion, not only a correct one.
Illustrative preview. Live assessment logic and institutional configuration are developed within controlled pilot environments.
For lecturers
The lecturer remains in control.
Akanya does not replace academic judgement. It gives lecturers better evidence on which to apply it.
Add sources, set requirements, then review and approve the draft.
Source material
Case document: sefako-rivers-case.pdf · 23 pages
Permitted resources: Case only
Uploads happen inside the lecturer environment, never on this public site.
Question and outcome
Question: Recommend a regional expansion approach to the board.
Learning outcome: Judgement
Reasoning components
- Source evidence
- Evidence selection
- Initial position
- Targeted challenge
- Revision
- Final judgement
Lecturer review and approval
Set question types, marks and duration. Review the source-grounded draft, edit the questions and approve the paper before testing or inviting participants.
Illustrative lecturer view. Final pilot features may vary.
See the current Review screen
